Skip to Content
Main content

HURLBUT W SMITH K-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

324

60%

LEVEL 2

132

24%

LEVEL 3

62

11%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

302

56%

LEVEL 2

140

26%

LEVEL 3

75

14%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

143

52%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

179

65%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

159

59%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

25

50%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

50

52%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

227

64%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

203

58%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

235

53%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

215

49%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

89

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

87

85%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

237

55%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

52

12%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

214

50%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

69

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

87

78%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

88

76%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

61

53%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

263

62%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

266

59%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.