Skip to Content
Main content

PS 60 ALICE AUSTEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

141

32%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

165

37%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

58

45%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

55

52%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

68

68%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

83

72%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

130

30%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

143

34%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

22

79%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

40

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

112

38%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

118

44%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.