Skip to Content
Main content

IS 204 OLIVER W HOLMES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

215

45%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

70

15%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

179

39%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

104

41%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

29

31%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

21

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

63

66%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

126

47%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

133

38%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

100

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

84

76%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

172

42%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

123

33%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

43

67%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

53

49%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

162

44%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

165

40%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

86

21%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.