Skip to Content
Main content

PS 220 EDWARD MANDEL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

79

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

46

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

43

26%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

40

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

58

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

42

38%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

23

39%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

79

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

30

71%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

75

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

84

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

46

67%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

31

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

28

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.