Skip to Content
Main content

PS 161 ARTHUR ASHE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

75

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

102

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

41

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

61

36%

LEVEL 4

61

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

23
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

154
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

74

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

73

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

197
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

13

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

25

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.