Skip to Content
Main content

PS 165 EDITH K BERGTRAUM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

119

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

54

16%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

151

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

75

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

57

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

76

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

144
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

101

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

164
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

126

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

16

38%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

27

40%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

13

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

111

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

145

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

40

61%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

119

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

149

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

42

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

46

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

44

17%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

105

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.