Skip to Content
Main content

PS 216 ARTURO TOSCANINI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

71

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

74

23%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

94

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

46

31%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

56

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

26

36%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

21

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

66

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

69

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

14

36%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

91

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

29

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

31

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.