IS 96 SETH LOW GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

226

35%

LEVEL 2

191

30%

LEVEL 3

109

17%

LEVEL 4

121

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

231

33%

LEVEL 2

172

24%

LEVEL 3

128

18%

LEVEL 4

176

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

94

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

134

40%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

125

35%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

160
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

107

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

46

65%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

72

44%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

151

27%

LEVEL 2

179

32%

LEVEL 3

108

19%

LEVEL 4

120

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

160

26%

LEVEL 2

156

26%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

173

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

75

84%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

71

72%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

96

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

226
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

130

28%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

81

17%

LEVEL 4

145

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

96

43%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

152

37%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

82

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

188

33%

LEVEL 2

139

24%

LEVEL 3

100

18%

LEVEL 4

143

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.