Skip to Content
Main content

PS 160 WILLIAM T SAMPSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

89

14%

LEVEL 2

136

21%

LEVEL 3

188

29%

LEVEL 4

240

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

74

11%

LEVEL 2

118

18%

LEVEL 3

193

30%

LEVEL 4

266

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

118

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

120

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

122

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

249
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

146

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

393
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

102

19%

LEVEL 3

161

29%

LEVEL 4

232

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

428
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

89

16%

LEVEL 3

171

31%

LEVEL 4

257

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

121

21%

LEVEL 3

178

31%

LEVEL 4

234

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

102

18%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

258

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

39

56%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

276
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

194

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

283
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

199

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

41

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

146

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

394
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

225

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.