Skip to Content
Main content

PS 235 JANICE MARIE KNIGHT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

117

18%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

206

32%

LEVEL 4

186

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

484
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

110

15%

LEVEL 2

149

20%

LEVEL 3

224

30%

LEVEL 4

260

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

104

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

274
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

77

19%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

151

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

210
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

367
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

107

18%

LEVEL 2

137

22%

LEVEL 3

195

32%

LEVEL 4

172

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

447
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

98

14%

LEVEL 2

139

20%

LEVEL 3

211

31%

LEVEL 4

236

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

95

15%

LEVEL 2

138

22%

LEVEL 3

203

33%

LEVEL 4

186

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

482
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

78

11%

LEVEL 2

143

20%

LEVEL 3

222

32%

LEVEL 4

260

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

391
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

110

17%

LEVEL 2

143

22%

LEVEL 3

205

32%

LEVEL 4

186

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

484
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

101

14%

LEVEL 2

146

20%

LEVEL 3

224

31%

LEVEL 4

260

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

94

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

108

23%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

319
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

95

18%

LEVEL 2

121

23%

LEVEL 3

153

29%

LEVEL 4

166

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.