Skip to Content
Main content

PS 96 RICHARD RODGERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

204

41%

LEVEL 2

143

28%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

64

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

160

34%

LEVEL 2

136

29%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

103

41%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

17

35%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

62

50%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

51

47%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

125

41%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

128

33%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

76

69%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

61

62%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

166

36%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

38

81%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.