Skip to Content
Main content

H B THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

138

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

35

10%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

178

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

69

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

74

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

69

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

104

58%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

80

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

179
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

117

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

56

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

137

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

174

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

237
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

137

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

277
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

171

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

133

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

168

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.