Skip to Content
Main content

GARDEN CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

96

22%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

186

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

63

13%

LEVEL 3

150

31%

LEVEL 4

257

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

94

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

194
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

36

15%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

128

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

92

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

129

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

10

71%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

23

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

27

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

84

23%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

147

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

339
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

58

14%

LEVEL 3

131

32%

LEVEL 4

208

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

83

20%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

184

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

50

11%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

247

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

176

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

393
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

63

13%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

248

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.