Skip to Content
Main content

MCVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

157

62%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

172

70%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

74

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

84

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

83

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

88

69%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

39

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

49

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

81

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

80

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

34

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

35

59%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

153

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

171

73%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

156

67%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

171

75%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

125

72%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

116

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

32

40%

LEVEL 4

32

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

56

57%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.