Skip to Content
Main content

COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

140

34%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

94

23%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

137

34%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

63

33%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

111

31%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

40

83%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

58

26%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.