Skip to Content
Main content

BRUSHTON-MOIRA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

75

44%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

33

29%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

60
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.