Skip to Content
Main content

CITY HONORS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

176

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

264

63%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

83

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

123

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

93

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

141

66%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

30

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

104

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

16

6%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

155

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

24

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

32

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

21

62%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

25

63%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

175

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

258

66%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

136

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

12

4%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

192

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

40

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

72

55%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.