Skip to Content
Main content

PS 74 HAMLIN PARK CLAUDE AND OUIDA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

187

72%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

144

62%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

97

71%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

73

61%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

90

73%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

71

62%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

167

75%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

121

62%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

127

66%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

102

57%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

60

88%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

175

71%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

135

61%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

173

71%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

134

60%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.