AMHERST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

82

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

62

15%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

96

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

102

39%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

82

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

95

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

228
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

81

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

30

35%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.