ELMIRA HEIGHTS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

126

33%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

143

34%

LEVEL 2

103

24%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

46

79%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

63

85%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

89

41%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.