HARPURSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

139

52%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

49

42%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

72

49%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

90

60%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

98

40%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

132

52%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

41

85%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

39

91%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

89

50%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

107

57%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.