Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

153

28%

LEVEL 3

185

34%

LEVEL 4

152

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

145

27%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

162

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

187
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

80

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

287
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

161

35%

LEVEL 4

126

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

288
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

115

26%

LEVEL 3

156

36%

LEVEL 4

132

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

26

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

160

35%

LEVEL 4

143

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

161

36%

LEVEL 4

149

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

334
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

150

28%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

151

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

338
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

158

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

28

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

28

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

160

34%

LEVEL 4

124

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

134

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.