HUNTS POINT SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

228

80%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

4

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

214

75%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

104

79%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

98

74%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

124

81%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

116

76%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

46

72%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

179

80%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

162

76%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

154

75%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

150

71%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

74

93%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

64

85%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

153

76%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

152

72%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

75

90%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

62

84%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

27

87%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

201

79%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

200

74%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.