Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BED STUY 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

280

92%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

30

7%

LEVEL 4

366

89%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

137

90%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

185

88%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

143

94%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

181

90%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

221
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

204

91%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

279
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

253

87%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

60

92%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

94

94%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

249

95%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

317

97%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

31

70%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

69
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

49

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

143

94%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

81

93%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

137

90%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

312
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

285

88%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.