Skip to Content
Main content

YATES COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

223

30%

LEVEL 2

208

28%

LEVEL 3

208

28%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 758

LEVEL 1

194

26%

LEVEL 2

228

30%

LEVEL 3

209

28%

LEVEL 4

127

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

130

32%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

182
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

295
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

207

30%

LEVEL 2

193

28%

LEVEL 3

197

28%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

320
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

177

25%

LEVEL 2

209

30%

LEVEL 3

201

28%

LEVEL 4

119

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

125

20%

LEVEL 2

183

30%

LEVEL 3

197

32%

LEVEL 4

109

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

202

32%

LEVEL 3

200

31%

LEVEL 4

124

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

98

73%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

81

68%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

174

38%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

146

32%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

335
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

192

26%

LEVEL 2

225

30%

LEVEL 3

208

28%

LEVEL 4

127

17%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

316
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

219

30%

LEVEL 2

206

28%

LEVEL 3

206

28%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

332
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

188

25%

LEVEL 2

224

30%

LEVEL 3

207

28%

LEVEL 4

125

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.