Skip to Content
Main content

GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

128

34%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

168

42%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

74

38%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

83

40%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

124

34%

LEVEL 2

117

32%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

166

42%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

56

76%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

65

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

156

41%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.