Skip to Content
Main content

BATAVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

200

36%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

170

33%

LEVEL 2

153

29%

LEVEL 3

116

22%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

99

35%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

122

29%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

146

31%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

143

31%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

54

73%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

198

36%

LEVEL 2

164

30%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

197
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

116

23%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

160

48%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

143

43%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

185
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

189

35%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

195
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

162

32%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.