KIPP ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

85

17%

LEVEL 3

179

35%

LEVEL 4

186

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

77

15%

LEVEL 3

132

26%

LEVEL 4

266

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

86

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

130

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

194
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

100

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

214
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

38

14%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

136

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

150
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

78

34%

LEVEL 4

72

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

160
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

105

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

205
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

111

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

230
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

156

56%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

59

14%

LEVEL 3

148

36%

LEVEL 4

177

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

51

12%

LEVEL 3

105

25%

LEVEL 4

244

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

347
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

76

16%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

181

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

376
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

67

14%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

255

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

17

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

34

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

335
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

79

17%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

169

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

71

15%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

232

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

333
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

79

17%

LEVEL 3

162

35%

LEVEL 4

171

37%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.