Skip to Content
Main content

BLIND BROOK-RYE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

457
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

76

13%

LEVEL 3

194

34%

LEVEL 4

263

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

489
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

84

14%

LEVEL 3

190

31%

LEVEL 4

299

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

120

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

138

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

245
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

143

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

250
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

161

51%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

27

77%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

28

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

30

77%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

29

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

351
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

61

14%

LEVEL 3

165

38%

LEVEL 4

186

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

369
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

154

32%

LEVEL 4

215

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

18

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

25

49%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

446
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

13

2%

LEVEL 2

67

13%

LEVEL 3

187

36%

LEVEL 4

259

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

72

13%

LEVEL 3

174

31%

LEVEL 4

294

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

21

39%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

448
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

75

13%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

259

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

482
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

81

13%

LEVEL 3

188

31%

LEVEL 4

294

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

453
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

74

13%

LEVEL 3

191

34%

LEVEL 4

262

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

482
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

83

14%

LEVEL 3

188

31%

LEVEL 4

294

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.