Skip to Content
Main content

RYE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,101
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,405

LEVEL 1

83

6%

LEVEL 2

221

16%

LEVEL 3

529

38%

LEVEL 4

572

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,031
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,385

LEVEL 1

88

6%

LEVEL 2

266

19%

LEVEL 3

525

38%

LEVEL 4

506

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

526
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

111

16%

LEVEL 3

256

38%

LEVEL 4

270

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

476
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

134

21%

LEVEL 3

240

37%

LEVEL 4

236

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

575
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

45

6%

LEVEL 2

110

15%

LEVEL 3

273

37%

LEVEL 4

302

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

555
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

46

6%

LEVEL 2

132

18%

LEVEL 3

285

39%

LEVEL 4

270

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

80

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

116
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

76

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

911
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,165

LEVEL 1

63

5%

LEVEL 2

191

16%

LEVEL 3

455

39%

LEVEL 4

456

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

838
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,142

LEVEL 1

69

6%

LEVEL 2

235

21%

LEVEL 3

456

40%

LEVEL 4

382

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

27

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

31

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,080
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,314

LEVEL 1

40

3%

LEVEL 2

194

15%

LEVEL 3

514

39%

LEVEL 4

566

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,008
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,285

LEVEL 1

41

3%

LEVEL 2

236

18%

LEVEL 3

507

39%

LEVEL 4

501

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

43

47%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

47

47%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,065
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,361

LEVEL 1

80

6%

LEVEL 2

216

16%

LEVEL 3

515

38%

LEVEL 4

550

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

989
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,327

LEVEL 1

78

6%

LEVEL 2

260

20%

LEVEL 3

502

38%

LEVEL 4

487

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

36
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

22

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,089
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,374

LEVEL 1

77

6%

LEVEL 2

208

15%

LEVEL 3

521

38%

LEVEL 4

568

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,021
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,353

LEVEL 1

80

6%

LEVEL 2

252

19%

LEVEL 3

519

38%

LEVEL 4

502

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.