HILLCREST SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

223

57%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

44

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

211

49%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

101

57%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

122

57%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

130

53%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

38

61%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

53

67%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

172

60%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

150

48%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

174

52%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

168

45%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

43

77%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

122

46%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

131

41%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

101

83%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

80

70%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

20

35%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

27

38%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

203

61%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

184

51%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

200

56%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

190

48%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

23

66%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.