WILLIAM B WARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

137

33%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

62

15%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

123

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

64

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

59

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

59

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

71

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

105

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

99

25%

LEVEL 3

123

32%

LEVEL 4

122

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

23

52%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

238
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

105

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

255
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

95

24%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

122

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

85

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

107

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

241
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

256
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

134

32%

LEVEL 4

122

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.