Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT E BELL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

475
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

69

12%

LEVEL 3

152

27%

LEVEL 4

323

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

63

11%

LEVEL 3

156

27%

LEVEL 4

329

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

246
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

163

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

230
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

160

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

229
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

160

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

255
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

169

56%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

12

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

65

86%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

61

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

350
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

58

14%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

229

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

358
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

51

12%

LEVEL 3

117

27%

LEVEL 4

241

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

16

44%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

56

11%

LEVEL 3

139

27%

LEVEL 4

313

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

464
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

49

9%

LEVEL 3

145

28%

LEVEL 4

319

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

472
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

69

12%

LEVEL 3

150

27%

LEVEL 4

322

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

481
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

62

11%

LEVEL 3

154

27%

LEVEL 4

327

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

458
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

67

12%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

314

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

464
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

58

11%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

318

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.