CHAPPAQUA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,415
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,682

LEVEL 1

78

5%

LEVEL 2

189

11%

LEVEL 3

473

28%

LEVEL 4

942

56%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,410
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,646

LEVEL 1

64

4%

LEVEL 2

172

10%

LEVEL 3

478

29%

LEVEL 4

932

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

668
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

32

4%

LEVEL 2

96

12%

LEVEL 3

229

29%

LEVEL 4

439

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

668
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 786

LEVEL 1

30

4%

LEVEL 2

88

11%

LEVEL 3

235

30%

LEVEL 4

433

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

747
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 886

LEVEL 1

46

5%

LEVEL 2

93

10%

LEVEL 3

244

28%

LEVEL 4

503

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

742
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

34

4%

LEVEL 2

84

10%

LEVEL 3

243

28%

LEVEL 4

499

58%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

63
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

43

61%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

59
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

42

66%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

223
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

193

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

224
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

7

3%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

193

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,047
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,256

LEVEL 1

51

4%

LEVEL 2

158

13%

LEVEL 3

392

31%

LEVEL 4

655

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,043
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,232

LEVEL 1

43

3%

LEVEL 2

146

12%

LEVEL 3

392

32%

LEVEL 4

651

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

44

42%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

42

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,369
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,545

LEVEL 1

30

2%

LEVEL 2

146

9%

LEVEL 3

448

29%

LEVEL 4

921

60%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,353
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,512

LEVEL 1

22

1%

LEVEL 2

137

9%

LEVEL 3

443

29%

LEVEL 4

910

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,407
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,664

LEVEL 1

70

4%

LEVEL 2

187

11%

LEVEL 3

469

28%

LEVEL 4

938

56%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,398
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,627

LEVEL 1

59

4%

LEVEL 2

170

10%

LEVEL 3

472

29%

LEVEL 4

926

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,378
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,616

LEVEL 1

59

4%

LEVEL 2

179

11%

LEVEL 3

458

28%

LEVEL 4

920

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,369
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,580

LEVEL 1

52

3%

LEVEL 2

159

10%

LEVEL 3

458

29%

LEVEL 4

911

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

22

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

21

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.