BENJAMIN TURNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

278

64%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

41

9%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

225

70%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

128

59%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

89

68%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

150

68%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

136

72%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

239

66%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

180

73%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

34

60%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

191

56%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

129

59%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

87

94%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

96

93%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

254

62%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

198

69%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

27

84%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

36

62%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

259

68%

LEVEL 2

82

21%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

189

72%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

246

62%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

198

69%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.