Skip to Content
Main content

EDGEMONT UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

708
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

33

4%

LEVEL 2

125

14%

LEVEL 3

291

34%

LEVEL 4

417

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

737
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 862

LEVEL 1

33

4%

LEVEL 2

92

11%

LEVEL 3

299

35%

LEVEL 4

438

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

310
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

122

31%

LEVEL 4

188

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

336
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

47

12%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

203

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

398
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

58

12%

LEVEL 3

169

36%

LEVEL 4

229

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

401
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

45

10%

LEVEL 3

166

36%

LEVEL 4

235

51%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

48
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

30

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

52
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

28

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

294
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

17

5%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

212

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

307
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

222

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

315
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

74

18%

LEVEL 3

158

39%

LEVEL 4

157

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

324
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

48

12%

LEVEL 3

161

42%

LEVEL 4

163

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

21

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

670
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

107

14%

LEVEL 3

262

33%

LEVEL 4

408

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

708
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

10

1%

LEVEL 2

74

9%

LEVEL 3

278

35%

LEVEL 4

430

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

29

39%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

23

33%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

702
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

33

4%

LEVEL 2

124

14%

LEVEL 3

287

33%

LEVEL 4

415

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

731
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 853

LEVEL 1

33

4%

LEVEL 2

89

10%

LEVEL 3

297

35%

LEVEL 4

434

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.