GREENBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

284

39%

LEVEL 2

187

26%

LEVEL 3

136

19%

LEVEL 4

113

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 700

LEVEL 1

260

37%

LEVEL 2

167

24%

LEVEL 3

155

22%

LEVEL 4

118

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

104

28%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

28

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

26

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

134

48%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

112

44%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

115

40%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

114

38%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

181

31%

LEVEL 2

173

29%

LEVEL 3

132

22%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

171

29%

LEVEL 2

160

27%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

116

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

103

81%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

89

86%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

236
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

246

38%

LEVEL 2

172

26%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

107

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

230

35%

LEVEL 2

155

24%

LEVEL 3

147

23%

LEVEL 4

117

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

30

59%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

65

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

205

45%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

200

43%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

248
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

277

39%

LEVEL 2

185

26%

LEVEL 3

135

19%

LEVEL 4

113

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

269
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

255

37%

LEVEL 2

163

24%

LEVEL 3

152

22%

LEVEL 4

117

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.