Skip to Content
Main content

IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

110

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

147

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

72

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

62

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

75

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

11

46%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

24

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

86

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

101

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

107

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

143

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

108

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

143

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.