IRVINGTON UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

525
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

124

18%

LEVEL 3

218

32%

LEVEL 4

307

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

554
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

48

7%

LEVEL 2

104

15%

LEVEL 3

218

31%

LEVEL 4

336

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

128

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

261
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

161

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

294
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

179

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

293
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

175

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

16

37%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

24

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

50

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

54

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

373
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

80

17%

LEVEL 3

151

32%

LEVEL 4

222

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

390
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

64

14%

LEVEL 3

161

34%

LEVEL 4

229

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

17

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

26

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

512
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

102

16%

LEVEL 3

212

34%

LEVEL 4

300

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

537
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

88

14%

LEVEL 3

207

32%

LEVEL 4

330

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

25

42%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

523
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

37

5%

LEVEL 2

121

18%

LEVEL 3

216

32%

LEVEL 4

307

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

551
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

100

14%

LEVEL 3

215

31%

LEVEL 4

336

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

494
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

33

5%

LEVEL 2

108

17%

LEVEL 3

194

31%

LEVEL 4

300

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

517
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

33

5%

LEVEL 2

92

14%

LEVEL 3

193

30%

LEVEL 4

324

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

24

43%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

25

39%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.