Skip to Content
Main content

TUCKAHOE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

134

32%

LEVEL 4

148

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

113

25%

LEVEL 3

135

30%

LEVEL 4

160

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

70

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

83

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

78

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

77

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

29

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

107

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

108

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

147

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

159

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

272
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

144

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

285
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

155

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

138

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

154

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.