Skip to Content
Main content

MT KISCO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

35

44%

LEVEL 4

25

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

22

55%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

105
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

63

61%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

62

63%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

39

42%

LEVEL 4

30

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.