Skip to Content
Main content

NORMAN R KELLEY INTERMEDIATE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

268

58%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

62

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

233

49%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

137

58%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

122

50%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

131

58%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

163

51%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

151

46%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

39

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

30

70%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

58

71%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

222

54%

LEVEL 2

111

27%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

186

44%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

46

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

62

42%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

206

66%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

181

55%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

221

48%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.