Skip to Content
Main content

HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 882

LEVEL 1

302

34%

LEVEL 2

279

32%

LEVEL 3

202

23%

LEVEL 4

99

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 865

LEVEL 1

277

32%

LEVEL 2

266

31%

LEVEL 3

206

24%

LEVEL 4

116

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

145

33%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

157

36%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

142

33%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

267

34%

LEVEL 2

250

32%

LEVEL 3

180

23%

LEVEL 4

88

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

286
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

239

32%

LEVEL 2

232

31%

LEVEL 3

180

24%

LEVEL 4

106

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

172

24%

LEVEL 2

244

35%

LEVEL 3

191

27%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

142

21%

LEVEL 2

235

34%

LEVEL 3

194

28%

LEVEL 4

112

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

130

73%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

135

74%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

322
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

273

32%

LEVEL 2

265

31%

LEVEL 3

206

24%

LEVEL 4

116

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

117

29%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

107

22%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

138

29%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

185

39%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

170

44%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

320
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

274

32%

LEVEL 2

265

31%

LEVEL 3

205

24%

LEVEL 4

115

13%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 862

LEVEL 1

290

34%

LEVEL 2

272

32%

LEVEL 3

202

23%

LEVEL 4

98

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

320
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 842

LEVEL 1

261

31%

LEVEL 2

261

31%

LEVEL 3

204

24%

LEVEL 4

116

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.