Skip to Content
Main content

LAKE GEORGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

104

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

111

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

62

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

59

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

63

41%

LEVEL 4

42

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

52

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

100

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

102

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

110

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

89

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

27

33%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.