GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

223

29%

LEVEL 2

223

29%

LEVEL 3

217

28%

LEVEL 4

111

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

229

29%

LEVEL 2

216

27%

LEVEL 3

219

28%

LEVEL 4

128

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

105

27%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

114

30%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

124

31%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

20

41%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

183

28%

LEVEL 2

181

27%

LEVEL 3

198

30%

LEVEL 4

100

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

310
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

183

27%

LEVEL 2

189

28%

LEVEL 3

193

28%

LEVEL 4

117

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

17

44%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

123

19%

LEVEL 2

198

31%

LEVEL 3

213

33%

LEVEL 4

111

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

128

19%

LEVEL 2

185

28%

LEVEL 3

217

33%

LEVEL 4

128

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

100

78%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

101

75%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

82

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

134

33%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

157

41%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

159

41%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

322
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

211

28%

LEVEL 2

215

29%

LEVEL 3

211

28%

LEVEL 4

111

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

344
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

220

29%

LEVEL 2

207

27%

LEVEL 3

216

28%

LEVEL 4

128

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.