Skip to Content
Main content

GLENS FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

152

32%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

162

31%

LEVEL 2

148

28%

LEVEL 3

142

27%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

128

28%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

73

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

70

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

68

82%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

71

80%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

108

43%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

131

28%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

211
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

157

31%

LEVEL 2

141

28%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.