Skip to Content
Main content

ELLENVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

158

49%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

137

42%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

77

48%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

81

50%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

71

41%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

86

58%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

69

51%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

53

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

55

81%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

130

41%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

133

54%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

113

47%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

152

48%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

130

41%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.