Skip to Content
Main content

CAHILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

31

37%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

22

30%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

25

37%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

29

38%

LEVEL 4

24

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

37

42%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

39

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.