J WATSON BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

263

43%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

122

20%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

307

41%

LEVEL 2

231

31%

LEVEL 3

148

20%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

150

41%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

145

44%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

157

42%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

19

39%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

117

29%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

44

63%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

96

62%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

123

63%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

157

33%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

195

33%

LEVEL 2

204

34%

LEVEL 3

143

24%

LEVEL 4

54

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

106

77%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

112

77%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

216

39%

LEVEL 2

157

28%

LEVEL 3

120

22%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

258

38%

LEVEL 2

225

33%

LEVEL 3

147

21%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

49

88%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

203

56%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

240

56%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

203
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

304

41%

LEVEL 2

228

31%

LEVEL 3

147

20%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

255

43%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

122

20%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

294

40%

LEVEL 2

228

31%

LEVEL 3

148

20%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.