SOUTHOLD UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

37

44%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

22

30%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

53

36%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

16

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

22

69%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

34

32%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

32

57%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.